🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and structure: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of headlights or flashlights as the police arrive, their faces and voices expressing caution or fear or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an social media personality by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and tormented her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were repeatedly called, the accused shot Owens dead through her closed front door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found evidence that the suspect had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of the caller contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really imply anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws generate senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the fact of gun ownership and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Gun Culture

It is feasible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how minimal concern the officers took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in recordings that were not included). Or is gun ownership so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her neighbors a very long time, Lorincz was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is revealed in the end titles. A very sombre portrayal of U.S. justice and consequences.